I see from my list in Blogger that this post will be my 100th post since I started this blog back in October. I've enjoyed sharing my pictures, and I thank everyone who has looked and commented on them. I hope you liked what you find here. Since it is sort of milestone, I thought I would post something a little different and pose a question or two about my photography, workflow, and post processing. The reason I'm doing this is simple. I follow a lot of photo blogs, and I find everyone's else's pictures much better than mine. It could be that I'm my own toughest critic, but comparing my pictures to those I see on other blogs, mine tend to look a little "over processed" and less than natural looking. It could be that others have been at this a lot longer and are much better photographers than I am. Maybe others think differently, but I'd be interested to find out what others think. So in an effort to post what I consider to be more natural looking photos in the future, I'm looking carefully at my workflow and the programs I'm using to do the post processing. I'm also looking at my camera settings at time of capture and how they might influence my final images after post processing. There are so many variables to control, but I have to admit, I do enjoy tinkering with all the aspects of digital photography.
As an example of what I'm talking about. This first image is typical of my normal workflow of images in this blog. It's the jpg image, straight out of the camera, with a curve adjustment, highlight recovery, shadow recovery and sharpening done in Aperture. I then exported the jpg for this blog.
This next image is the same photo as above, reprocessed from the original RAW file using Nikon's Capture NX 2. When starting with the RAW file, I eliminated all the camera settings used to produce the the jpg above. I changed the white balance, did a curve adjustment and sharpened. I saved the image as a jpg, and prepared it for this blog exactly this same way as the first image.
I know which image I like better. There are some subtle differences and I'd like to know what others think. Feel free to comment on any aspect of the image whether it be subject matter, composition, exposure, whatever. And finally, if others do a lot of post processing, do you adjust the image for a pleasing image, or to the way you remember the image looking at the time of capture? Thanks for looking.